Prediction markets are scaling. Disputes are scaling with them. Verdikta resolves subjective market outcomes through explicit criteria, independent AI Arbiter panels, and on-chain settlement callbacks.
Polymarket's recent dispute-resolution scrutiny shows a larger category problem: real-world outcomes are often messier than market text.
When traders disagree, the resolution process must be explicit, auditable, and fast.
Verdikta lets prediction-market operators submit the market question, resolution criteria, accepted evidence sources, an evidence packet, and the requested verdict format.
A replacement resolution layer for markets where subjective interpretation matters.
Decisions are evaluated against explicit market rules.
Evidence and rationale can be packaged for review.
Verdicts generally finalize in under two minutes.
Verdicts cost around ~$0.30 per verdict, recently as low as ~$0.15 depending on network conditions and oracle pricing.
Verdicts can be returned to smart contracts for settlement callbacks.
Multiple independent Arbiters evaluate the request rather than a single centralized decision-maker.
Before a market goes live, Verdikta can score ambiguity risk and suggest clearer resolution criteria.
For disputed or already-resolved markets, Verdikta can produce a structured evidence packet, verdict, and rationale for comparison.
For full integrations, Verdikta can return verdicts on-chain so market contracts can trigger settlement logic automatically.
Run a two-week shadow-resolution pilot. Pick 1–2 disputed markets, define the criteria, package the evidence, and compare Verdikta's time-to-verdict, rationale clarity, and settlement-readiness.
Run a shadow-resolution pilot